This week in the values debate: 5/6/2008
Framing: general to specific
This week, most Democrats will be focused on the outcome of the Indiana and North Carolina presidential primaries. After a long spring (and what promises to be a longer summer) you could be forgiven for having a bit of election fatigue. The Democratic primary has been especially difficult this year because, in terms of policy, Clinton and Obama have substantial similarities. Because of these broad similarities, their debates have focused on policy minutiae. Undecided Democrats are parsing every last statement looking for a justification of one candidate over the other.
The risk, as the candidates delve into these details, is for an old criticism of the Democratic party to resurface. Here is the criticism: we are a collection of disparate interest groups rather than a unified movement.
Our diversity is the key to our strength. We need to always ensure, however, that we are presenting a unified message to voters. Our message needs to explain how the labor movement, the environmental movement, the civil justice movement and other groups are united for change. This will help us counteract the impression that our party is just a loose coalition of unions, environmentalists, lawyers and others.
HDA believes that Values can present a framework for developing that unified message. We believe that each Democratic policy position can be framed in terms of community, opportunity, responsibility, trust or service.
We believe that the best way to express our political viewpoints are to use these values as the beginning of each political conversation. Begin with this value, then move from general to specific, in order to make your point.
Values
Frames
Issues
When you are speaking with a voter at his or her door, preparing a speech or writing a letter to the editor, resist the urge to dive into policy details. You can get into specifics, but be patient. Before you tell voters what you are going to do, tell them why. What value drives your decision? Then frame the issue in terms of a dichotomy. Explain how your position is different from the other side's position. Then specifically address the issue at hand.
By approaching political topics in this way you can accomplish two goals. You can engage voters on the level of values. You can also help reinforce the impression that our party is united around a set of broad goals. Then we can avoid being dragged down by our differences.
|